By Ana Espino | Published on september 9, 2025 | 2 min read
#SCI #Physiotherapy
#ClinicalPracticeGuidelines
Spinal cord injuries (SCI) cause
severe impairments in motor, sensory, and autonomic functions, significantly
compromising the functional independence of affected individuals. In the face
of this complex condition,
physiotherapy plays a fundamental role in recovery
and the prevention of complications. However,
clinical guidelines specific to
this discipline remain fragmented. The available guidelines often focus on
isolated aspects of the care pathway, without providing a comprehensive
framework adapted to physiotherapy practice.
The
limitations of available data
represent a major obstacle. Few high-quality clinical trials assess the
effectiveness of physiotherapy-specific interventions, and the
variability of
practices in the absence of a common reference framework undermines the
consistency of care. Added to this is a
lack of methodological structure, with
few recommendations based on rigorous processes such as the GRADE system.
In this context, this study was
initiated to develop a clinical practice guideline for the physiotherapeutic
management of adults with SCI. It was based on a systematic review of the
evidence and expert consensus, with the aim of harmonizing and improving
clinical practice.
What is the evidence for
physiotherapy in SCI?
The methodology was based on the identification of more than 100 predefined
PICO questions by a panel of clinicians, researchers, and patient
representatives. Each question was addressed through a systematic review of the
available data, including 76 randomized controlled trials (RCTs), the results
of which led to 20 meta-analyses. The GRADE system was used to assess the
quality of the evidence and to formulate the recommendations.
The
results show that only
14
recommendations are supported by
evidence from RCTs, while the majority are
based on
expert opinion. Clinically relevant
interventions include
wheelchair
skills training, virtual reality to improve
sitting balance,
prolonged
stretching for
joint mobility,
TENS for
neuropathic pain, and
targeted muscle
strengthening. Regarding physical fitness, arm or hand cycling and circuit
training were found to be beneficial for cardiorespiratory health. Other areas,
such as orthostatic hypotension, shoulder subluxation, or spasticity, were
addressed through expert consensus due to insufficient data.
So what’s next for rehabilitation?
Spinal cord injury leads to major functional deficits requiring specialized
management. The diversity of practices, the lack of robust clinical trials, and
the absence of targeted physiotherapy recommendations make standardizing care
difficult. This study aimed to establish a clinical practice guideline based on
evidence and expert consensus to guide the rehabilitation of adults with SCI.
It represents a
first step toward a
more
coherent,
accessible approach
aligned with real-world practice. However,
the available data are limited, often of low quality, and the recommendations
rely largely on expert opinion. The
absence of an international panel and the
exclusion of non-English studies also limit the
scope of the guideline.
Next steps include
updating the
recommendations, expanding the panel geographically, and most importantly,
producing high-quality clinical trials focused on interventions that are
actually used in practice. Greater involvement of clinicians and patients in
setting research priorities will be essential to strengthen the clinical
relevance of future recommendations.
Read next: Does education really make a difference in lower back pain?
About the author – Ana EspinoPhD in Immunology, specialized in Virology
As a scientific writer, Ana is passionate about bridging the gap between research and real-world impact. With expertise in immunology, virology, oncology, and clinical studies, she makes complex science clear and accessible. Her mission: to accelerate knowledge sharing and empower evidence-based decisions through impactful communication.