2024-12-11
Kangduo vs Da Vinci: a duel of robots in urological surgery
Urology-nephrology
Can Kangduo compete with Da Vinci?
A total of 201 adult patients who underwent urological surgeries — nephrectomy, cystectomy, or prostatectomy — were selected and divided into two groups based on the system used (Kangduo or da Vinci). The performance of the two robots was compared using several criteria: operating time, blood loss, postoperative complications, and patient satisfaction.The results reveal that although the operating time is longer with the KD system (180 minutes compared to 130 minutes for da Vinci), it presents notable advantages. Specifically, blood loss is reduced, thereby lowering the risk of hemorrhage. Furthermore, postoperative complications are less frequent, with an infection rate of 11.7% compared to 29.1% for da Vinci, and fever rates of 15% compared to 30.5%. Patient satisfaction is comparable between the two systems, exceeding 95% in both groups. Finally, the cost of the KD system is approximately 25-30% of that of the da Vinci system, providing a significant economic advantage.
Kangduo: a promising alternative in robotic surgery
The Kangduo system delivers performance comparable to that of da Vinci, with notable advantages such as reduced blood loss and lower postoperative complication rates. While operating times are currently longer with the KD system, this delay could decrease as surgeons become more familiar with the technology.
                                                        Last press reviews
Curcumin in prostate cancer: a promising therapy supported by nanotechnology
                    By Carolina Lima | Published on November 4, 2025 | 3 min read<br>
Plant-based diets and disease progression in men with prostate cancer
                    By Lila Rouland | Published on November 4, 2025 | 3 min read<br><br>...
Omega-3 fatty acids: a nutritional lever against prostate cancer
                    By Lila Rouland | Published on November 3, 2025 | 3 min read<br><br>...