Previous Next

2024-04-03

Which induction agent for myocardial infarction patients requiring invasive mechanical ventilation ?

Anesthesia and Intensive Care

Patients with acute myocardial infarction requiring invasive mechanical ventilation have a high mortality. In this study, researchers evaluated the association between induction agent and mortality in 5,147 patients in this setting. They compared clinical outcomes between those receiving propofol (1,386 patients) and those receiving etomidate (3,761 patients). Patients in the propofol group were more likely to require vasoactive medication prior to intubation and mechanical circulatory support. The use of propofol was associated with lower mortality than etomidate, even after data adjustment. Total cost, days on ventilator and length of stay were higher in the propofol group.

Source(s) :
Alexander Thomas et al. Propofol vs etomidate for induction prior to invasive mechanical ventilation in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Am Heart J. 2024 Mar 28:S0002-8703(24)00074-7. ;

Last press reviews


Oropouche Virus: A New Threat to Monitor During Pregnancy?

By Ana Espino | Published on June 26, 2026 | 4 min read<br><br>

West Nile Virus: An Expanding Threat

By Ana Espino | Published on June 25, 2026 | 4 min read<br><br>

Chikungunya: Understanding the Mechanisms of a Virus Undergoing Global Expansion

By Ana Espino | Published on June 24, 2026 | 4 min read<br><br>