Previous Next
Nasal intermittent positive airway pressure (NIPPV) has been shown to be superior to post-extubation nasal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) in premature neonates. In this comparative efficacy and non-inferiority study, Canadian researchers hypothesized that CPAP would not be inferior to IPPV. In total, data were collected on 843 infants extubated with CPAP and 974 infants extubated with IPPV in 22 neonatal intensive care units. All infants were born before 29 weeks' gestation. The primary endpoint was failure of the initial mode of extubation ≤72 hours. Secondary judgment criteria included failure ≤7 days and reintubation ≤72 hours and ≤7 days. 

Source(s) :
Amit Mukerji et al. CPAP Versus NIPPV Postextubation in Preterm Neonates: A Comparative-Effectiveness Study. Pediatrics. 2024 Mar 21:e2023064045. ;

Last press reviews


SARS-CoV-2: What are its impacts on male fertility?

Since its emergence in 2019, SARS-CoV-2 has disrupted global public health...

Adherence to Antiretroviral Therapy (ART): The role of digital health in supporting HIV-positive patients

Adherence to antiretroviral therapy (ART) is essential to prevent the prog...

Stress and its impacts on brain alterations: toward a better understanding of ADHD

Attention-Deficit / Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) is a complex neurodevelo...